| Comment: Outcomes and visions Ilora Finlay
 pp 120-120
 Increasingly, those providing healthcare will be required to demonstrate positive outcomes and show that their care is underpinned by  evidence of effectiveness. So the types of outcome that will be needed and the shape of  services in the future are worth considering. Outcomes fall into four categories concerning the patient, their relatives, the health economics of the service, and the wider outcomes that relate to society as a whole.
 | 
						| Critical appraisal of invasive therapies used to treat chronic pain and cancer pain John Williams
 pp 121-125
 The new era of controlled trials is revealing less biased information about the role of invasive therapies in pain management. However, more controlled information is required to give clearer information to patients, medical colleagues (including the development of guidelines for clinical practice) and purchasers. Because of the heterogeneous nature of pain, there is a place for invasive therapies within a multidisciplinary environment and among carefully selected, targeted patients.
 | 
						| The management of malignant wounds Patricia Grocott
 pp 126-129
 Malignant wounds are caused by the infiltration of a local tumour or the metastatic spread of a primary tumour into the skin and its supporting blood and lymph vessels. Unless the growth of malignant cells is halted by single or combination treatments, extending fungation can cause massive damage at the wound site through  proliferative growth, loss of vascularity and  ulceration. The situation for the patient may be aggravated by tumour-related problems, for  example lymphoedema as a consequence of impaired lymphatic drainage. Symptom control measures and wound dressings are the mainstay of the care of patients with malignant wounds.
 | 
						| Euthanasia – a European debate Helen Walsh
 pp 130-132
 Euthanasia is a complex subject, presenting both moral and ethical dilemmas. While every healthcare professional recognises the need for a ‘good death’, some argue that it is a fundamental human right. Within the UK the search for a good death has been through holistic care, appropriate symptom control and  emotional support. Physicians within the Netherlands, however, have approached the  challenge from a different perspective, responding to requests to end suffering by  facilitating euthanasia – that is, by the direct  killing of individuals at their own request to  prevent further suffering.
 | 
						| Why I oppose euthanasia in exceptional circumstances René Schaerer
 pp 133-133
 We must recognise the serious nature of the report drafted by the Comité Consultative National d’Ethique pour les Sciences de la Vie et de la Santé (CCNE; National Consulting Ethics Committee for Life Sciences and Health) entitled, ‘Fin de vie, arrêt de vie, euthanasie’ (end of life, put an end to life, euthanasia). We must extol the firm stance taken against continuous therapy, and the  reference in the report to the importance of patient autonomy, but, above all, the explicit  reference to ‘the promotion of values, beyond which there would be no society’.
 | 
						| Modernity, Britain and the culture of cremation Lisa Kazmier
 pp 134-137
 Why on earth would anyone study cremation? To many people, it suggests the mere study of ‘dead people’ yet in examining developments up to the past decade, some of my subjects – and  the cultural values they embrace – are very much alive. It takes a while for this irony to register; although sociologists, anthropologists and historians have long gained insight into a society through understanding its death rituals.
 | 
						| When the family demands the discontinuation of morphine Daniel Azoulay, Susan Brajtman, Malka Yehezkel, Ruth Shahal-Gassner and Aaron Cohen
 pp 138-140
 The problems encountered by the palliative care team when a patient’s family demands the discontinuation or reduction in dosage of an analgesic or sedative are complex and varied. Comprehensive dialogue and an understanding of the reasons behind the family’s request are paramount to achieve consensus and a workable compromise. Family reasons are extremely varied, personal and, at times, surprising and inconsistent. The most common impetus is based on the wish not to lose contact with the patient whose state of consciousness is steadily deteriorating.
 | 
						| Bereaved children’s support groups: where are we now? Mary Blanche and Sue Smith
 pp 142-144
 The provision of support for bereaved children has aroused much debate in recent months. Services for children have proliferated in the last few years and recent publicity given to an article by Harrington and Harrison highlighted the conclusion that most bereaved children do not need support outside their own families. However, the Harvard study has shown that approximately one-third of bereaved children do experience significant problems and are seen to be at significant risk two years after the death of a parent.
 | 
						| Creativity and coming of age Elizabeth Hall, Mandy Pratt and Lucinda Jarrett
 pp 146-150
 In the transition to adulthood we draw on a wide range of social influences, in particular  adult role models and peers encountered directly or through the media. Our peers also provide support and affirmation that we are ‘okay’ as we explore the world with increasing  independence and try to decide what really matters to each of us – in short, who we are. This is an account of one young person (Sarah)  growing up in extraordinary circumstances,  without the usual role models, without regular  contact with a long-established peer group, without even the certainty that she would grow  up.
 |